With only a few days left until the start of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, which billions of people around the world are eagerly awaiting, the massive sporting celebration brings not only unforgettable joy but also serious concerns for the global environment. According to experts, the upcoming tournament could leave the largest and most devastating carbon footprint in the history of sports.
This tournament will open a completely new chapter in football history, as for the first time 48 national teams will compete for the top prize. As a reminder, previous World Cups consistently featured 32 teams. Due to the increased number of participants, the scale of the matches has expanded — the global competition will take place this year from June 11 to July 19 on the pitches of three major North American countries: the USA, Canada, and Mexico.
Ocean-like distances and the flights of millions of fans
Organizing the competition across three massive countries creates significant logistical challenges. Players and delegation members will be forced to take constant long-haul flights for group stage and knockout matches. For example, the distance between the host cities of Miami (USA) and Vancouver (Canada) alone is nearly 4,500 kilometers. The problem is not limited to the players. In addition to the teams, hundreds of officials, thousands of media personnel, and millions of passionate fans will travel frequently between North American cities by plane and train. According to official estimates provided by FIFA, it is expected that
more than 5 million fans from all over the world will attend this grand tournament. Countless emissions: Several times more than the Olympics and Qatar
Special environmental model analyses conducted by experts at the prestigious University of Lausanne (UNIL) in Switzerland have revealed alarming figures. According to these, the total amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted into the atmosphere during the one-month competition could reach
9 million tons. If we compare this figure with other major sporting events held in recent years, the severity of the situation becomes clear: Competition Name
CO2 emissions
Paris 2024 Olympics | Approximately 1.75 million tons |
Qatar 2022 World Cup | Approximately 3.17 million tons |
2026 World Cup (USA, Canada, Mexico) | 9 million tons (Forecast) |
Renowned geographer David Gogishvili from the University of Lausanne assessed the situation as follows: | “While there has been a clear trend toward minimizing carbon footprints and protecting nature in the organization of the Olympic Games in recent years, unfortunately, we see the exact opposite in the men's FIFA World Cup — an increase in environmental damage.” |
2030 World Cup: The geography of stadiums will expand even further
Most regrettably, FIFA does not seem to want to draw the right conclusions from this environmental criticism. It has been announced that for the next
2030 centenary World Cup,
the competition's geography and stadium coverage will expand even further, and emission levels will break records. The upcoming 2030 World Cup will initially start with three historic opening matches in three South American countries: Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay. After that, teams and millions of fans will fly across the ocean to continue the competition on the European and African continents, hosted by Morocco, Spain, and Portugal. Such commercial steps in the football world could jeopardize the future of our green planet. Do you think it is right for FIFA to turn a blind eye to such massive environmental damage in its pursuit of expanding football geography and increasing profits?
{{TEXT_32}}
{{TEXT_33}}
Read “Zamin” on Telegram!
