The Clarity Act, aimed at establishing clear and firm rules for the U.S. cryptocurrency industry, is seen by many as a sign of moving away from the "regulation by enforcement" approach of the Biden administration. While the bill proposes clearer definitions and a consistent regulatory framework on paper, experts warn that legal clarity alone will not lead to mass adoption of crypto assets. This is reported by Coindesk.com .
Currently, the U.S. crypto tax system remains highly complex and confusing. Specifically, while the Form 1099-DA reporting required from crypto brokers aims to increase transparency, it is producing the opposite result in practice. Users often receive forms with missing cost basis information or incorrectly recorded holding periods, forcing retail investors to manually verify thousands of transactions.
The problem is that when assets are moved between platforms, information about their purchase price is often lost. The system treats digital assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum as if they were traditional securities held in a single brokerage account. As a result, the entire burden falls on the taxpayer, who must reconstruct their entire transaction history or face audit risks.
While audit and accounting requirements under the Clarity Act are necessary for regulation under the CFTC, their technical implementation is extremely difficult. Creating continuous audit trails to prove the segregation of customer funds increases trust, but reconciling 24/7 blockchain data with off-chain records in real-time requires immense operational resources from firms.
Read “Zamin” on Telegram!
