
In the United Kingdom, an employee who was unusually dismissed from her workplace defended her rights in court and obtained a large compensation payment from the company. According to the publication The Telegraph, the British woman, Joanne Neale, proved the illegality of her dismissal and won the case against her former employer. As a result, the company is obligated to pay her £25,000 for moral damage and financial losses.
How did the incident occur?
As it became known, Joanne Neale was at home on her day off when she suddenly received a notification from the company manager about an online meeting via video call. Without knowing the real reason for this conversation, the woman initially thought it was about some ordinary work matter.
However, during the video call, the company executive informed her that she was on the list of employees being laid off. The most important part was that she was not given any opportunity to ask questions, discuss the decision, or appeal against it.
Moral damage and psychological stress
This situation had an extremely negative impact on the woman’s psychological state. According to Joanne, such an unexpected and abrupt announcement of the decision from the company caused her nervous stress and anxiety.
In this regard, Joanne Neale turned to the South London court to defend her rights. In her statement, she indicated that the company’s actions constituted a gross violation of workers’ rights and labor legislation.
What decision did the court make?
During the court proceedings, Judge Liz Ord emphasized that the employer informed the employee too late about the meeting regarding her dismissal and had not notified her in advance about the purpose of the conversation. According to the judge, this put the woman in an extremely unpleasant and uncomfortable situation.
Moreover, during the court case, additional important details came to light. In 2022, Joanne Neale had appealed to company management with a request to allow her to work from home two days a week due to health issues. However, the company refused her request and even restricted her ability to take sick leave, which further aggravated the situation.
The court considered this case an example of gender discrimination and inequality. The reason for this was that in selecting the employee to dismiss, the company relied on work schedules. It is statistically known that women are more likely than men to work part-time or reduced hours.
According to the court decision, the company is obligated to pay compensation of £25,000 for the moral damage inflicted on the woman and the loss of income resulting from her job loss.
An important precedent for employee rights
The result of this court case could become an important example for many employees in the United Kingdom in protecting their rights. Once again, it has confirmed how important it is to adhere to labor legislation and respect the rights of employees during dismissal procedures.
Now, many British companies will act more cautiously in similar situations, as violating employees’ rights could lead to large compensation payments.
This case once again highlights the necessity of paying attention to the observance of employees’ rights in labor relations. Read 'Zamin' on Telegram!
Ctrl
Enter
Did you find a Mistake?
Highlight the phrase and press Ctrl+EnterRelated News