Russian deputy launches a debate on the historical heritage of Uzbeks in Siberia

In his recent speech, Khalid Tagizode, a deputy of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug (KMAO) Duma, called some regions of Siberia the historical lands of the Uzbeks. He noted that these territories were once part of the Siberian Khanate, the last ruler of which was Khan Kuchkum, a descendant of the Shaybani dynasty. Tagizode described this dynasty as an Uzbek dynasty belonging to the Bukhara Khanate, saying:

"Perhaps these migrants are returning to their historical homeland."

This statement was made at a meeting of the Yugra government and quickly caused a wide discussion on social networks. Many Yugra residents criticized this idea, considering it an attempt to falsify historical data.

According to historical sources, the Siberian Khanate was ruled by Khan Kuchkum in the 16th century, who was from the Shaybani dynasty. However, considering these territories as belonging to the Uzbeks is a controversial issue from a historical point of view, and many historians oppose this idea.

The Khanty and Mansi peoples of the KMAO have been living on their historical lands, and it is widely recognized that these territories belong to them. Tagizode's statement contradicts these historical facts.

Experts and public figures sharply criticized Tagizode's statement, saying that his words could threaten the territorial integrity of the Russian Federation. They say that such statements can cause unrest and conflicts among the public.

In conclusion, caution and accuracy are important in historical issues. Statements that are not based on historical documents and evidence can cause misunderstandings and conflicts among the public. Therefore, a responsible and reasonable approach to historical issues is required.