The US Supreme Court has begun considering whether to allow police to identify criminal suspects through the databases of technology giants. This legal proceeding is expected to redefine digital privacy rights across the country. Techcrunch.com reports on this.
At the center of the debate are search warrants known as "geofence." Through these warrants, law enforcement agencies require companies like Google to provide location data for all users who were in a specific area at a specific time.
Civil liberties advocates consider this practice unconstitutional. In their view, such warrants result in the personal data of thousands of innocent people, who were accidentally nearby and have no connection to the crime, falling into the hands of the police.
The court case is related to the 2019 case of Okello Chatrie, who was accused of bank robbery. Using Google data, police identified three people who were near the bank, and one of them turned out to be Chatrie.
His lawyers argue that it is illegal for the government to conduct a search first and establish suspicion afterward.
In recent years, the number of such warrants in the US has increased sharply. Google receives thousands of such requests from federal agencies and police every year.
The Supreme Court's final decision is expected to be announced by the end of this year.
Read “Zamin” on Telegram!
