Renewed border clashes and mutual accusations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have once again raised tensions across the region, highlighting the fragility of South and Central Asia’s security landscape. For China — which has positioned itself as a stabilizing force and quiet mediator — the situation represents a crucial test of its diplomatic credibility and regional influence. Beijing‘s growing footprint in both countries, particularly through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its investments in infrastructure and mining projects, has long been seen as a lever for fostering stability. Yet the recent escalation demonstrates the limits of such economic and diplomatic tools when faced with entrenched political and security challenges.
Mediation Efforts and Limits of Influence
Since the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, China has actively sought to play the role of a pragmatic intermediary between Islamabad and Kabul. Several rounds of talks, including high-profile trilateral foreign ministers’ meetings and consultations with senior officials in both countries, were organized with the aim of fostering “regional peace and shared development.” Beijing has also engaged in quiet diplomacy, hosting informal consultations and encouraging dialogue to reduce tensions.
However, these efforts have faced persistent constraints. Pakistan continues to prioritize internal security concerns related to the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other militant groups, often making its domestic calculus outweigh external mediation. Afghanistan, for its part, emphasizes national sovereignty and remains wary of engagement that could be perceived as compromising its autonomy, particularly in the post-Taliban political environment. The result is a situation in which China’s mediation, while valued symbolically, struggles to translate into concrete, lasting agreements on the ground.
Economic Tools Fall Short of Ensuring Stability
China’s extensive economic engagement in both countries — historically viewed as the foundation of regional trust and influence — has produced mixed results. High-profile projects, such as the Mes Aynak copper mine in Afghanistan, have been delayed for years, while several planned energy initiatives have progressed more slowly than expected. These delays have fueled frustration among Afghan stakeholders and reinforced the perception that China’s engagement remains primarily transactional rather than transformative. For Pakistan, reliance on Chinese investment through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has created expectations of sustained economic support, but the recent border tensions underline the limits of economic leverage in addressing security-driven political conflicts.
Between Non-Interference and Strategic Involvement
Beijing now faces a delicate balancing act: protecting its economic and security interests while adhering to its longstanding principle of non-interference. Security concerns — including the safety of Chinese personnel and infrastructure in Pakistan and the potential spillover of militancy into China’s Xinjiang region — compel Beijing to maintain active engagement, even as it seeks to avoid overt political entanglement. Analysts note that this duality highlights a structural tension in China’s regional diplomacy: the more it invests and becomes involved, the harder it becomes to maintain a narrative of detached neutrality.
A Test of China’s Diplomatic Model
The current tensions underscore the limits of China’s “development-led stability” approach. While infrastructure projects, investment, and economic incentives can facilitate cooperation, they cannot replace the political trust, mutual understanding, and conflict-resolution mechanisms that underpin long-term stability. Unlike traditional Western powers, which have historically relied on coercive leverage or security guarantees, China’s diplomacy is largely dependent on persuasion and shared economic benefit — tools that are often insufficient in deeply polarized regional contexts.
For China, Pakistan, and Afghanistan alike, this episode serves as a reminder of the region’s complex security and political dynamics. Sustained stability will require not only continued investment and engagement but also the cultivation of trust, reliable communication channels, and adaptive diplomatic strategies that account for domestic political realities. Beijing‘s ability to navigate these challenges will likely shape its broader influence in South and Central Asia for years to come.
Read “Zamin” on Telegram!
