A new era in MMA: damage is now valued, not strikes

How might the MMA scoring system change?
There’s big news in the world of martial arts: the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) is considering making significant changes to MMA fight scoring rules. This was announced at the organization’s conference.

What is being proposed?
A new ruleset, developed under the leadership of former renowned UFC referee John McCarthy, emphasizes not just effective strikes or controlled grappling, but the real damage inflicted on the opponent.

What were the current criteria?
Currently, when determining the winner of a fight, judges primarily assess effective strikes, then positional dominance, control, and aggression. However, these criteria have sometimes led to dissatisfaction with fight outcomes.

Now, not just strike power but its effect matters
ABC head Andy Foster commented on the updated rules:

“The new document will more clearly guide judges on how to assess fighters. The most important question now is — what harm did the fighter inflict on his opponent?”

Why is this approach important?
The new procedure may standardize judging, reduce controversial decisions, and increase trust among fans. In some cases, fighters who controlled the bout still lost on the judges’ scorecards.

What do experts think?
Long-time UFC referee John McCarthy and other experts support the innovation. In their opinion, the ‘damage’ criterion better reflects true dominance in a fight and reduces empty aggression.

When will it take effect?
The document is currently under discussion. If approved, the new rules could be implemented in all major MMA events — including UFC, Bellator, PFL, and others.

Conclusion:
The MMA world is on the verge of a new era. Now, every strike will be judged not only by its power but by the actual damage inflicted. This change will completely update fighters’ tactics, judges’ approach, and fans’ impressions. Read 'Zamin' on Telegram!