Important protection for migrants from Boston court: The Trump administration's deportation plan has been rejected

The issue of migrants in the U.S. remains high on the agenda. On Saturday, May 17, Reuters reported that the federal court in Boston rejected a proposal by President Donald Trump’s administration to deport migrants to Libya and El Salvador. The ruling is viewed by human rights advocates and legal experts as a significant step in protecting civil liberties.

Content of the court panel’s ruling

A panel of three judges from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals expressed serious concern over the Department of Homeland Security’s deportation policy. They highlighted the potential for “irreparable harm” to deportees if the policy is found to be unlawful.

Cooperation with El Salvador and detention matters

In February, the Salvadoran government agreed to accept deported individuals from the U.S., including those charged with violent crimes, and place them in local prisons. The agreement also included the return of offenders previously convicted in the U.S.

“Voluntary deportation” program: assistance or pressure?

In recent months, the Trump administration announced the launch of a “voluntary deportation” program. Within this system, undocumented migrants can leave the U.S. “legally” through a dedicated digital platform — the CBP Home app.

In addition, each migrant who voluntarily agrees to return is offered a $1,000 stipend, which is paid after their repatriation is officially confirmed.

Homeland Security's cost calculation

According to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, this “voluntary” mechanism allows the government to save up to 70% on deportation costs. Currently, the average cost of detaining, housing, and deporting an undocumented migrant exceeds $17,000.

Zamin.uz conclusion

The Boston court's ruling is regarded as an important legal safeguard for migrants in the U.S. According to international organizations and human rights activists, such decisions test whether government policies align with humanitarian standards.

Today, migration issues are a global concern — not just for the U.S. What do you think could be an effective solution? Is “voluntary” deportation a true choice or a subtle form of pressure?

The Zamin.uz editorial team will continue covering key developments in migrant rights and human dignity. Read 'Zamin' on Telegram!