Photo: nypost.com
After the disclosure of new documents on the Jeffrey Epstein case, public discussions intensified again. A number of publications wrote that the U.S. Department of Justice published a large volume of materials related to Epstein.
Against this backdrop, Elon Musk also commented on the topic, stating that he was in favor of disclosing documents. He claimed that there had been very little correspondence with Epstein, and he had also repeatedly declined offers to go to Epstein's Island or to fly on a plane called the "Lolita Express." According to Reuters, in the correspondence that emerged, it was noted that Musk refused an invitation to Epstein Island.
Musk made another point clear: he had a premonition that even a small number of letters could be misinterpreted and turned into a "black PR" tool against his name. However, he emphasized that there was something more important than this situation - those who were guilty of serious crimes together with Epstein, especially those involved in crimes such as the exploitation of underage girls, should be held accountable. (The fact that the Epstein case was specifically related to sexual exploitation and human trafficking accusations is widely covered in documents and court proceedings.)
Notably, the disclosed documents mention various prominent figures, but this "only mentioned" does not automatically mean fault - the materials may contain notes of various formats, lists, correspondence, and other record-keeping traces. Therefore, the most correct approach to the public is one: to read each episode separately with the content, context, and legal assessment of the document.
In short, the decisive question on this topic is not "who greeted whom," but "who will answer for the crime." Now the main pressure is also here: will disclosure become a real investigation and real accountability, or will it become another wave of hype.
Read “Zamin” on Telegram!
