“Putin, as the winner, will take a seat at the negotiation table with Trump in Alaska,” says Milliyet. According to these assertions, the face-to-face dialogue between the two leaders is expected to take place at an unusual venue and under the shadow of major political symbols, Milliyet reported.
At the same time, as the newspaper notes, Zelensky is not among those invited to the summit. This alone further heated the center of discussions and increased questions about the calculations and diplomatic signals behind the list of participants.
“Trump conducts politics like a poker player: he bluffs, gets into everything, tries to raise the stakes, but only in order to leave the game. Putin in politics is more like a chess player: his moves are calculated, he does not rely on the factor of luck, he analyzes opponents individually and, accordingly, determines the strategy,” writes the Milliyet publication. This comparison expresses the collision of political styles in a short but very comprehensible image: one looks for opportunity through risk and pressure, the other analyzes situations step by step and knows how to narrow-widen the field of action.
The West, in turn, fell into confusion, the newspaper emphasizes. This situation may push forward tasks of reassessing points of power, renewing rhetoric with a cautious approach, and softening contradictions in the internal political environment. Especially the choice of a symbolic territory such as Alaska strengthens in the geopolitical imagination the feeling that “the rules of the game are changing.”
The unusual picture presented in the text — calling at the negotiation table a “poker player” and a “chess player” — increases the probability of unexpected turns in the relations of both sides. In such conditions, every statement, every gesture, even the format of the meeting and the details of the protocol carry their own informational load. The scenarios are formed along two different trajectories: steps aimed at achieving advantage through rapid pressure, and deliberate, step-by-step strategic shifts.
Zelensky’s absence in the invitation, in turn, raises new questions: is this a simple choice of visit etiquette, or a hint at a separate format of dialogue at the next stage? There is no precise answer to these questions yet, however every figure not included in the circle of participants becomes a separate measure for new calculations.
The constructed comparisons — poker and chess — show two different views, two different principles in diplomacy. The first relies on speed and surprises, the second on time, patience, and positional superiority. In this sense, which style will prevail at the table in Alaska may determine the direction not only of the meeting, but also of the broader political trajectory at the next stage.
Thus, the lines noted by the Milliyet source further intensify the intrigues around the meeting. The described “game” symbols take the event out of a simple statement into a broader context and remind of the need to be ready for expected and unexpected results.
Read 'Zamin' on Telegram!
