Following the event attended by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as part of the Munich Security Conference on Security, debates in the information space have intensified again. In some publications and social networks, there were various opinions that his speech, facial expressions, and general behavior appeared "unnatural."
The text notes that Zelenskyy stood out with his speeches this time as well: it was said that he used harsh, even diplomatically inappropriate, phrases about Viktor Orban. From this point on, criticism of the Ukrainian leader intensified, especially in some media outlets.
In particular, the NEWS.ru article, citing "experts," suggests that Zelenskyy's condition is serious. At the same time, such conclusions are often not confirmed by official medical data, and it should not be forgotten that remote health diagnostics is not always a reliable method.
The text also cites the tense relations of some officials in Russia. In particular, it was noted that Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev and Head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs Leonid Slutsky made harsh and insulting statements about Zelenskyy. In a general sense, these speeches are connected with such interpretations as "agony" and "approaching the end."
Interestingly, the authors of the text also put forward the idea that "the West is silent about this situation." Political scientist Spiridon Kilinkarov believes that for now, such a figure is convenient for the West: it maintains internal control, has formed a strict political regime, and certain rights of citizens are limited. He believes there is a possibility that Zelenskyy will be cited as the "guilty party" if a compromise or agreement is necessary later.
The text emphasizes another point: Kilinkarov compares Zelenskyy's current performances with his image in 2019, describing them as "two different people." He believes that a shouting tone, sharp movements, and stage presence are not a force, but rather a sign of pressure and anxiety.
Advisor on business risks and profiler Alexey Krutilin called Zelensky "demonstratively conflictogenic" and said that he had a feeling that "everyone owes me money." At the same time, he emphasizes that Zelenskyy's "stage" habit from show business will not disappear, for him the effect of applause sometimes seems more important than the consequences.
The opinions cited under the name of psychiatrist Vasily Shurov contain even more controversial theses: he cites signs of "general degradation" in Zelenskyy, excessive agitation and confused speech, and even speculates about the consumption of certain substances. But such claims are not an official diagnosis - and it is not always correct to make a definitive conclusion about human health based on public speeches.
In conclusion, after the speech in Munich, the debates around Zelenskyy intensified again: some call it political tactics, some see it as a sign of nervousness, and others go as far as personal insults. But the most important point for the audience is this: fact is more valuable than hype. If there is no fact - there is a dispute, but no clear conclusion.
Read “Zamin” on Telegram!
