The school strike at Minab became a bloody symbol of the war

The strike on a school in Minab, Iran, became one of the most tragic and controversial symbols of the war. International media are providing various information about who is behind this attack.
According to a report by Reuters news agency, the school may have been hit by the United States military. At the same time, The New York Times noted that the attack on the school coincided with the strike on a nearby military facility.
Washington, on the other hand, stated that an investigation is underway in connection with the incident and denies accusations of deliberately striking a civilian building. However, it is also noted that the American side has not yet provided clear evidence on this issue.
Iran struck the US military base Al-Darfa in the UAE on March 7. According to Tehran, this base may have participated in the attack on a school in Minab.
According to information released by the Iranian Armed Forces General Staff, the number of American soldiers killed and wounded in the attack on this base may have exceeded 200.
At the same time, it is noted that at the time of the news about the attack on this base, former US President Donald Trump said that "very strong strikes" against Iran could be carried out. Some observers link this statement to the possibility of serious losses among the American military.
One of the most controversial statements during the war was made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He claims that he and Donald Trump are jointly performing the task of "saving the world." Interestingly, these words were spoken in a completely serious tone.
Observers say that before the start of the "world-saving operation," the situation in the world was much quieter than it is today.
Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Arakchi gave an interview to one of the American television channels. During the interview, the journalist told him: "American troops may attack your country by land. Aren't you afraid of this?"
The drunkard answered this question sharply: "No, on the contrary. We are waiting for them." This statement is being assessed by some analysts as a very strong call.
Although many condemn the war, some observers believe that face-to-face combat is more open and direct than retreat by firing missiles from a distance.
At the same time, some analysts note that it may be difficult for American troops to venture into such a scenario. Because entering the territory of Iran and fighting is not a simple military operation, but a very complex and dangerous process.
If the matter had been settled by killing one person, Iran would have collapsed long ago. The US has started a war that should never have started. Now he doesn't know how to finish it.
Read “Zamin” on Telegram!